ACA Implementation Toolkit for Departments of Insurance
Georgetown University Health Policy Institute – Mila Kofman, Katie Dunton and Sally McCarty
In order to assist states in accomplishing tasks related to insurance market reforms and certification and management of qualified health plans, the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute has developed a toolkit for insurance departments. Many Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation issues fall squarely within existing state insurance regulatory functions. This toolkit is designed to help insurance regulators effectively implement ACA provisions, regulations, and other guidance by planning and allocating resources for and conducting many of the plan management functions associated with successful exchange implementation.
This toolkit includes several self-audits, templates, and checklists to help departments of insurance work in concert with other state agencies in ascertaining the appropriate locus of exchange related functions. Further, the toolkit can help state agencies operationalize those responsibilities. The toolkit will be updated periodically with additional resources and uploaded to www.StateNetwork.org. The list of specific resources and descriptions follow:
Form Review Checklist, Model Notices and Examples The form review checklist is a document for insurance regulators to use in reviewing forms associated with products (insurance contracts, policies, certificates of coverage, etc.) filed by issuers for approval prior to offering the products to consumers. The document in the toolkit serves as an example of the Form Review Checklist. To fill out the form, download the editable file here.
ACA Insurance Self-audit The self-audit is a chronological, step-by-step checklist that gives states a guide as they analyze their insurance laws, rules and regulations, etc. for compliance with the ACA.
Exchange Functions Checklist The exchange functions checklist is a tool to help departments of insurance work with their health insurance exchanges to identify and document functions they may currently perform and to determine which entities should perform these functions going forward.
Work Plan Template The work plan template is a matrix designed to allow state officials to identify tasks that have been completed, what is on-going, and what needs to begin for plan management functions.
Qualified Health Plan (QHP) Certification ‘Cheat Sheet’ This summary of QHP provisions from federal guidance is designed as a quick reference for states providing a high level outline of requirements including certification of and minimum standards for QHPs.
Essential Health Benefits (EHB) Planning Template This template provides the key decisions and considerations states need to address in choosing an EHB benchmark plan and the related work to operationalize that decision once it is made.
To maximize efforts to maintain coverage, state Medicaid agencies and Marketplaces can now leverage digital channels as part of their overall outreach and communications efforts. Rapidly evolving changes in consumer media consumption habits as well as shifts in digital channels, and the ability to leverage data sources, enables granular audience targeting and efficient use of resources. These can be incorporated into an overall integrated outreach and education campaign to maximize renewals and coverage retention.
Individual-level data on race and ethnicity collected within the Medicaid program and in other state agencies is greatly influenced by federal guidance. This expert perspective summarizes the proposed revisions to the federal standards for collecting race and ethnicity that are currently out for comment, and provides considerations for states interested in submitting comments.
The unwinding of the Medicaid continuous coverage requirement represents the largest nationwide coverage transition since the Affordable Care Act, with significant health equity implications. Given the intense focus on coverage transitions during the unwinding, some states have initiated plans to publish a data dashboard to monitor progress. To date, three states—Iowa, Minnesota and Utah—have a public data dashboard. SHADAC will update this expert perspective as additional dashboards go live.
