Templates & Toolkits | Jun 25, 2015

Updated: Department of Insurance Consumer Services ACA Toolkit

Sally McCarty, David Cusano, Justin Giovannelli, and Max Farris, Georgetown University Health Policy Institute

In order to ensure that Consumer Services Divisions within state insurance regulatory agencies are equipped with the necessary resources to assist consumers experiencing insurance problems, the State Health Reform Assistance Network (State Network) team at the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute has developed a toolkit intended as a guide for consumer service representatives (CSRs).  The passage of the Affordable Care Act requires CSRs to maintain a level of familiarity with a new set of marketplace rules, benefit requirements, and reforms that regulate health insurer behavior.   Assuring that CSRs are familiar with these new requirements presents a significant challenge to busy insurance regulators who also have additional new responsibilities under the ACA.

The resources in this toolkit include a reference manual with multiple entries across a number of categories, a glossary of acronyms, terms, and definitions, a benefits crosswalk template, and a reference table illustrating the applicability of ACA provisions to grandfathered and self-funded plans.  The toolkit is in word format and is designed to be a template which insurance regulators can use to create their own state-specific manual tailored to individual state laws, rules, and bulletins. This toolkit is designed to be used in real time when CSRs are interfacing with consumers.

As of June 24, 2015, this document has been revised to reflect the below changes.

Section I – Health Insurance Basics

The description of “Health Savings Accounts” has been revised to include the contribution amounts for 2015.

The definition of “excepted benefit plans” has been revised to reflect the requirements under the final rule.

Section III – Purchasing and Renewing a Policy

The definition of “rescission” has been revised to more accurately reflect the requirements under federal law.

Section IV – Enrollment Eligibility

The open enrollment periods and triggering events have been revised to reflect updates to federal law.

The prohibition on waiting periods description has been revised to reflect a permissible one-month orientation period.

Section V – Discrimination

An additional example of discrimination has been added in the 2nd paragraph of the “discrimination in benefit plan design prohibited” subsection.

Section VI – Policy Coverage Requirements

The out-of-pocket limits have been updated.

The section addressing separate out-of-pocket maximums for benefits administered by third party administrators has been deleted because it’s no longer applicable.

Section VII – Notice Requirement

First paragraph has been updated to note that the SBC must be provided within 90 days of special enrollment.

The “accessibility of applications and notices” subsection has been updated to note that oral interpretation includes telephonic interpreter services in 150 languages.

 

 


Expert Perspectives

The No Surprises Act: Implications for States

In the waning days of 2020, Congress enacted a $900 billion COVID-19 relief package and government funding bill (H.R. 133). Included in the measure is the “No Surprises Act”, which contains new protections for consumers from surprise medical bills from out-of-network providers. The new law establishes, for the first time, comprehensive protections in the states without their own balance billing laws and for the nearly 135 million people in self-insured plans beyond the reach of state regulators. This expert perspective summarizes provisions that have particular implications for state regulators.

January 7, 2021

The State of Play: Public Option at the Federal and State Level and What to Expect in 2021

Faced with significant premium fluctuation and the risk of “bare counties”, many policy stakeholders have turned to the public option as a potential tool to promote stability and affordability in the individual insurance market. Since 2017, nearly a dozen states have considered or passed legislation to study or implement a state-based public option program. Additionally, the 2020 election and transition to a new federal administration marks a pivotal point for state policymakers with interest in fostering new coverage options. An incoming Biden Administration’s support for state innovation will create new state-based coverage opportunities, even as major federal legislation is unlikely under a divided Congress. This expert perspective provides a brief overview of selected states efforts to implement a public option and highlights what to expect in a federal policy environment.